BONZER WOLF™

Farve is a Diva: Who knew?

2009-12-23T16:15:48Z

Over the past three weeks, it’s become fairly obvious that the relationship between Minnesota quarterback Brett Favre and head coach Brad Childress has started to deteriorate, seemingly reaching a low point at the end of last Sunday’s game in Carolina when Childress lashe out at Favre in the locker room.

But much to the dismay of many a Vikings fan, the dispute between the two sunk even lower yesterday, with a new report from ESPN’s Ed Werder hitting the wire. Citing sources close to the team, Werder paints a less than rosy picture of the current situation in Minnesota, with the foundation of the Childress-Favre spat coming from a disagreement on the use or non-use of audibles on the field.

Favre has made it clear over the span of his 19 year NFL career that he prefers having the ability to check in or out of any play as he sees fit, and while Favre’s track record would seemingly indicate that success tends to follow, Childress apparently disagrees, so much so that he purposefully leaves Favre out of offensive game planning during the week leading up to games.

For his part, Favre has thus far refused to get into a war of words with Childress via the media in Minnesota, choosing instead to stay focused on defeating a terrible Chicago Bears squad next week in the cold at Soldier Field. A win would go a long way towards locking up the #2 overall seed in the NFC playoffs, which ensures a first round bye and a home game in the divisional round.

It remains to be seen if Childress will back down somewhat to keep his quarterback happy throughout the remainder of the season, but he would be wise to do so, as the fortunes of his team are tied for better or worse to Favre’s arm, and a Super Bowl run could be in the balance.

Farve is now and has always been a pain in the ass, Diva. Farve plays it nice to the cameras, while being a complete asshole behind closed doors. Green Bay did the right thing, when they cut him. The Jets found out the hard way. But as W.C. Felds said many years ago, "There's a sucker born every minute." Purple Suckers!

The color of Bullshit?

2009-12-19T18:04:41Z

ESPN GREEN I am so sick of the of the hypocrisy that I want to throw up. The espn green game is over at half time.

It's a huge blow out but you can tune in to listen to turd announcers tell you to wipe your ass with corn cobs. Recycle those cobs so espn can keep making billions of dollars, broadcasting 24/7/365 on their 23 Mother Mouse Ears channels (ABC/Disney).

ESPN is now spending more time hyping their next game, North Carolina vs Texas from Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas. The only green Jerry Jones cares about is the mighty green back!

Debbie Schlussel nails these hypocrites here : Extra Stupid Propaganda Network

"No hablo Ingles"

2009-12-19T17:33:09Z

In the past three years, at least 39 drivers in Dallas have been ticketed by police officers for the "offense" of being "a non-English speaking driver," according to a Dallas Morning News investigation. The software for officers' in-car computers features a check-off box with the phrase, perhaps leading officers (and their sergeants) to believe it constituted a separate traffic offense rather than merely an indication that the motorist might not have understood an officer's instructions. The police chief expressed shock at the report and promised to end the practice.

Google to sell cells!

2009-12-16T02:34:52Z

With Google's disclosure over the weekend that it would launch its own cellphone, the online giant is staking claim to a piece of the fast-growing mobile marketplace and making a direct challenge to Apples swift rise in the sector.

Google said in a corporate blog on Saturday that it has developed a phone based on its Android mobile operating system and distributed it to employees to try out. Soon after, pictures of the phone surfaced on the Twitter feeds of employees and outside bloggers with details that the device would be launched next month and sold directly to consumers. The new phone would be capable of operating on any network, according to a source close to the company who was not authorized to comment publicly.

Google's approach would run counter to the current practices of handset makers and carriers that partner up in exclusive deals to market and sell phones, and provide mobile service. Will this experiment work? Don Reisinger gives ten reasons why Nexus could beat iphone:

www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile-and-Wireless/10-Reasons-Why-the-Nexus-One-Could-Beat-the-iPhone-668632/

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned

2009-12-14T16:32:11Z

Jamie Jungers

Tiger Woods is well known among Las Vegas Blackjack dealers as the one of the "cheapest" high rollers ever. Woods often played blackjack with other sports personalities and celebrities, including Charles Barkley and Michael Jordon. Barkley, is known as one of the most generous tippers among dealers in Vegas.

Jamie Jungers has said that her affair with Woods began in Las Vegas and lasted two years. Apparently, Jungers thought she was the "only" other woman is Tiger's life. Jungers said their dalliance began in a nightclub in early 2005 after the married golfer beckoned the busty blond to his table. After a night of heavy drinking, the pair spent the night inside Woods' hotel room at the MGM Grand.

Woods then began flying Jungers across the country for sexual trysts. He even flew her to his Los Angeles home while his wife was out of town, she said. All the while, Woods never shied away from appearing in public with his new arm candy, Jungers said.

Jungers spoke out amid claims that she worked as an escort and received cash from Woods to pay for liposuction.

"I didn't even get a birthday card," Jungers said. "I got nothing out of this relationship but a broken heart."

Despite severe financial troubles, Jungers said that during her torrid, 2 year affair with the tarnished golfer, she asked him for help only once.

"He said, 'I can't,'" Jungers said.

"I said, 'I don't understand.' I thought maybe he was joking. I was already embarrassed to ask about it. That's when I told him, 'That shows to me how much I mean to you, and I can't do this anymore. I'm already in a rough position in my life, and I have more drama and that's what I don't need.'"

Jungers eventually found a way to cash in on her relationship with Woods. She has sold her story to a British tabloid. Jungers told the UK tabloid News of the World that she was with Woods that night in May 2006 when his mother called to let him know that his dad's condition was not very good. Earl Woods was suffering from cancer.

After his mom called with the news, Jungers said that Tiger looked utterly devastated and didn't say a word.

Earl Woods passed away soon after a visit from Tiger. But after returning from the hospital, Woods seemed subdued, "but when we went to bed he still wanted to have sex as usual," Jungers revealed.

Woods many character flaws, including his arrogance, selfishness, greed and stinginess were major contributors to his downfall. The only question, is why did it take so long for the shit to hit the fan?

Heisman Watch / BCS Sucks

2009-12-12T16:31:43Z

Colt McCoy, the senior and 2008 Heisman runner-up overcame a slow start to the season with a fantastic second half, peaking with 479 yards of total offense in the Longhorns' 49-39 defeat of Texas A&M. That made McCoy the favorite until his offensive line fell apart against Nebraska in the Big 12 championship game. Still, McCoy has thrown for 3,512 yards and completed more than 70 percent of his passes. He also is the Longhorns' second leading rusher with 348 yards.

McCoy should get the nod over the other finalists. McCoy is the winningest quarterback in college football, and he helped lead the Longhorns into the BCS national championship game without a strong running game. Here's another reason, I hope McCoy wins the coveted Heisman.

If Colt McCoy was the king of college football for a day, he knows the first thing he would do: Scrap the Bowl Championship Series and implement a playoff system.

``I've thought about it a lot,'' McCoy said. ``I'd have to say eight-team playoff and maybe cut the season one game short. I don't think you would lose that much money because the playoffs would generate a lot of interest and ultimately you could find out who the national champion was for sure.''

That's an interesting perspective, considering McCoy will play for the BCS National Championship on Jan. 7. But will McCoy really be playing for a true national title?

``I think at the end of this year, there are going to be two or three teams that are undefeated, so it's going to be hard not to argue that there should be a playoff system,'' McCoy said. ``It's not my call, but I'd be all for it. I honestly would. That's pretty neat,and that's how every other sport is determined.''

Five teams finished the season undefeated, but only two can play for a national championship. That's not fair, and at its core, the BCS system seems illegal. At best, the BCS appears to violate antitrust laws. At worst, it's just a white-collar racket.

Tiger Woods Pimp- U won't read about her in Wikipedia

2009-12-12T15:11:33Z

Rachel Uchitel is a name that will live in infamy (except in Wikipedia). Turns out Rachel is much more significant than an everyday Tiger Woods Ho. Santa Claus may stop at three ho's but for Tiger , Ho Ho Ho, is just the start of a good day. Many more will follow, thanks to his , uh, "friend", Rachael Uchitel.

Lemme tell you somethin', this pimpin that I got in my blood, it came from a family tree. My granddaddy was a pimp, my great great great granddaddy was a pimp. I'm talkin' bout pimpin' since been pimpin' since been pimpin'. -- Baby Powder

Rachel's grandparents ran El Morocco, which is as famous as New York clubs like the Copacabana, the Stork Club, 21, and the Cotton Club. She grew up in the "people" bidness". Promoters, hosts, waitresses, not all but many have, in the "bottle service era" are basically pimps and ho's.

Seve Lewis, a reporter at www.blackbookmag.com recently wrote a great article describing, Rachel Uchitel's "job description":

Say a rich dude or a celebrity who a club wants to entertain regularly and constantly is coming to a joint. A publicist or a friend with connections will hook him up with a dependable promoter or a club hostess or in many cases an owner/manager type. This VIP shows up ... a credit card will secure the real estate ,table, and some booze is thrown into the mix. Where that person is seated is the whole tamale. Promoters bring girls—girls who would die to meet a celebrity or a whale. Theywill have sex with him. Wake up, America—everyone is having sex, especially hotties and successful types. Cash may not actually change hands for sex; it’s not a straight-up money deal necessarily. But it’s more like a “pleased to meet you famous or rich sir” deal. A VIP usually has “entanglements” like a wife a gal or at least an image to maintain. The VIP can’t be seen hitting on random waifs in a club. He doesn’t have time to court or date these pretty young things. He might be thousands of miles away tomorrow. The getting-to-know-you phase is taken out of the mix. Promoters bring party girls out for a good time, and what happens after that is their own business but also the underlying business of clubs.

Waitresses in high-end clubs are required to book tables. If they don’t, they are replaced by waitresses who can. Although many can get by with a flirt or a sit on the lap, many butter their bread and butter. Sometimes it’s just an occasional dinner, or they serve as arm candy at a function ...sometimes they make introductions for their clients to their attractive, available, and very willing friends. Clubs encourage these outside-the-club meetings. A waitress with a big client will be allowed to come in late as long as they bring a whale to the joint after the opera or benefit. Some waitresses are flown to Vegas or LA because the whale needs beauties around him he can trust. That trust is the all-important commodity here. Trust comes first, even before sex and certainly after. The Tiger-in-your-bank scandal seems to have legs—lots of them. The “fore” golf jokes seem to be moving past four and even seven and, well, it doesn’t seem it will end anytime soon. Rachel Uchitel has done her job. She has kept her mouth shut. That was always the deal and is always the deal.

What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas, and what happens in New York clubs stays in New York clubs. When Malaysian millionaire Jho Low was spending megabucks in NYC clubs, this reporter did not run the story because it would have broken the rules to talk about his fun. The New York Post broke the story, and Mr. Low started to lay very low. Talk is not cheap. It costs the clubs megabucks when spenders and celebs feel too unsafe to partake. Rachel Uchitel is a not a waitress. Whether she slept with her client Tiger Woods or not is irrelevant to me. She has a Blackberry full of business and celebrity clients. Every host in NYC has the same.

Here's a WOLF newsflash: Ho's don't need to hire high power LA attorney Gloria Allred. High power pimps need high power attorneys.

Steve Lewis says, The Blackberry of one host at a high end joint that I have seen tells the story. In it was a line-by -line description on how to service hundreds of very important people ... for example, the client likes Grey Goose or Dom Perignon . He likes a table in the action, or maybe a quieter less conspicuous location. He likes tall fun blondes, or he likes a more intellectual type. He’s looking for action or whatever comes his way. The host provides what the VIP needs. “Dependable” girls are always ready. Some of these gals are aspiring actresses or looking for a husband or just like the fun, the thrill. It’s the reason they left Kansas in the first place. Whatever—the main thing is that over time they didn’t blab about what happened with the men in question to the gossips, and the clients enjoyed their company. This is merely the tip of the iceberg, and I’ll let you guys fill in the rest of the blanks. This is business as usual in clubdom, and as I said, obvious to everyone in the game. It takes a good national scandal to say it out loud.

Yet, Wikipedia, still does not think Rachel Uchitel is wiki worthy. That's all you need to know about Wikipedia, which is no longer relevant and is losing millions of editors and readers.

The Ass Clowns at Wiki have spoken

2009-12-10T04:58:46Z

I am so done with those ass clowns over at Wikipedia. I won't write about them anymore. But miloent knows all and wrote one hell of a blog on those losers. Wiki is no longer current or relevant.

Read the rest of the story here: milowent.blogspot.com/2009/12/rachel-uchitel-wikipedia-article.html

Health Care EMERGENCY

2009-12-08T18:16:00Z

The Senate is getting very close to passing their health care bill. Their goal remains the same as it was since the beginning - a government takeover of one-sixth of the U.S. economy. Whether it's through a government-run insurance plan, a national health exchange or mandating the purchase of government-forced insurance, their objective is achieved. At its core, any version of the Reid bill that puts federal bureaucrats, who have zero accountability, in charge of writing the rules, enforcing the rules and settling disputes is a Washington takeover of your health care.

Call your Senator today to tell them to oppose the Reid bill (H.R. 3590). This bill fails to lower costs, reduce the deficit or protect the quality of patients' care.

The latest from the Senate floor is that little has changed. The most significant votes taken in the last few days have been three separate instances of Democrats voting to cut nearly a half a trillion dollars from Medicare in order to fund a new entitlement program while still claiming that the bill is deficit neutral.

The vote is imminent and despite all polls to the contrary, many in Washington have forgotten they represent us - the will of the American people. Your voice in needed more now than ever before. We must tell the Senate and the rest of the Washington politicians they can't ignore the voice of "We, the people." It's all or nothing; it's time to show up for the final showdown.

BCS BS makes for an Unfair Trade Practice

2009-12-07T17:00:54Z

The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) runs a ranking system that picks the two teams that play for the national championship each year.

This year the University of Alabama and the University of Texas, ranked Nos. 1 and 2, will compete for the title on Jan. 7 in Pasadena, Calif. Texas Christian University (TCU) and the Boise State University which, like Texas and Alabama, are undefeated and rank high in all polls will be watching from the sidelines of the Fiesta Bowl.

A friend emailed today about the horrible play of the Cowboys yesterday and the fact that TCU got screwed by the BCS. He noticed what thousands of tweeters did last night. After the BCS bowl announcements on FOX, which owns the rights to broadcast all the BCS Bowl games, the word spread quickly. TCU and Boise State got screwed by the "Bowl Championship Series".

My buddy Longshanks, who finished in the top 500 on the espn College Picks regular season contest this season, emailed Mr. Wolf :

Think about this. Alabama and Texas are in the title game. Oregon and Ohio State are locked in the Rose Bowl. That leaves Florida, Iowa, and Ga Tech as the other BCS Conference top teams. Now imagine Cincinnati beats Florida, TCU beats Iowa, and Boise State beats Ga Tech. That would really screw things up for the BCS committee. I don't think that Florida will lose to Cincinnati, but I do think TCU and Boise could beat up on Iowa and Ga Tech.

TCU was "trending" as high as 4th last night which is huge on Twitter which has millions of worldwide users. Most of the TCU posts were about the BCS protecting their "member" conferences. No way the BCS was going to let TCU and Boise State both remain undefeated. This would result in 2/3 of the undefeated major college teams not being members of Bowl Championship Series conferences.

An oft-pitched alternative to the BCS is a playoff system. "Unless you broaden the base and let the teams in the last game win their way there, you are never going to have a true national champion," says my Representative in Congress, Rep. Joe Barton. Barton is sponsoring legislation aimed at forcing a playoff. Mr. Barton's district includes part of Fort Worth, where TCU is located.

The House Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection subcommittee is expected to vote this week on Mr. Barton's bill, which would effectively force a national playoff system by 2012. It would do so by making it an "unfair or deceptive" trade practice for anyone to market or promote a "national championship game" unless the game is "the final game of a single elimination post-season playoff system."

BCS Executive Director Bill Hancock's only lame response, "With everything going in the country right now, doesn't Congress have more important things to do?" This issue has drawn the attention of President Barack Obama, who said late last year that "we should be creating a playoff system" for college football.

I have said it before, and I will say again, this issue like every other issue is ALWAYS ABOUT THE MONEY.

Mr. Barton and other critics also say that in distributing its sizable revenue, the BCS reserves outsize shares for the six original conferences and the independent University of Notre Dame. "Our nation has weightier issues to tackle, but this issue merits some attention because college football is a billion-dollar enterprise that affects schools' funding for athletic programs, scholarships and capital projects," said Matt Sanderson, one of the founders of Playoff PAC, a group pushing for a new selection system. "That's important in this economy."

BCS officials and their allies argue that any move to a playoff system could adversely affect the numerous post-season bowl games. Even a four-team playoff would inevitably be expanded, they say, potentially leading to poor attendance, a shift of post-season games to campus locations from neutral sites, the death of the bowls and lost jobs.

JOHN D. MCKINNON and DARREN EVERSON of the Wall Street Journal contributed to this entry

Hoover Builds Bureaucratic Empire via Blackmail

2009-12-05T18:04:57Z

J. Edgar Hoover was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation1924 to 1972, a position he held for 48 years. Hoover held virtually unchecked public power, manipulating every president from FDR to Nixon. He kept extensive blackmail files to destroy any member of Congress or anyone else who opposed him.

Hoover is the model that career bureaucrats emulate as they build their own personal empires, which are financed by the taxpayers. Most government managers use their leverage against the government employees who work under them rather than high level officials. The results however, are the same.

The Executive Branch of the Federal Government continues to grow unchecked, reaching its tabernacles into every aspect of our lives while operating as the most costly and ineffective organization in human history. After all, they are financed by the largest pool of cash and credit in the world, the American taxpayer.

Prior to the formation of the "Bureau" in the Department of Justice, Secret Service agents at the Department of the Treasury were routinely assigned to conduct investigations for the DOJ. The Bureau of Investigation, which on January 1, 1935, became the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), was created in response to a Sundry Civil Service Bill passed in 1908.

The bill stated that Secret Service agents could no longer be assigned to any department other than the Treasury and any employee accepting such an assignment would be suspended for two years. The bill led Attorney General Charles J. Bonaparte to create a special agent force within the Department of Justice. When the bureau was established there were very few federal crimes, and their caseload consisted mainly of banking, bankruptcy and antitrust violations. The power of the FBI increased in 1910 with the passage of the Mann Act, also known as the White Slavery Act, which expanded FBI jurisdiction to include interstate crime.

Hoover entered on duty with the Department of Justice on July 26, 1917, and rose quickly in government service. He led the Department's General Intelligence Division (GID) and, in November 1918, he was named Assistant to the Attorney General. When the GID was moved in the Bureau of Investigation (BOI) in 1921, he was named as Assistant Director of the BOI. On May 10, 1924, Attorney General Harlan Fiske Stone appointed the twenty-nine year old Hoover as Acting Director of the BOI and by the end of the year Mr. Hoover was named Director.

As Director, Mr. Hoover put into effect a number of institutional changes to correct criticisms made of his predecessor's administration. Director Hoover fired a number of Agents whom he considered to be political appointees and/or unqualified to be Special Agents. He ordered background checks, interviews, and physical testing for New Agent applicants and he revived the earlier Bureau policies of requiring legal or accounting training.

Under Director Hoover, the Bureau grew in responsibility and importance, becoming an integral part of the national government and an icon in American popular culture. In the 1930s, the FBI attacked the violent crime by gangsters and implemented programs to professionalize United States law enforcement through training and forensic assistance. For example, the Bureau opened its Technical Laboratory to provide forensic analysis on Bureau investigations as well as services to other federal, state, and local law enforcement officials.

During the 1940s and 1950s, the Bureau garnered headlines for its staunch efforts against Nazi and Communist espionage. During World War II, the Bureau took the lead in domestic counterintelligence, counterespionage, and countersabotage investigations. President Roosevelt also tasked the Bureau with running a foreign intelligence service in the Western Hemisphere. This operation was called the Special Intelligence Service or SIS. In the early years of the Cold War, the Bureau took on the added responsibility of investigating the backgrounds of government employees to ensure that foreign agents did not infiltrate the government. More traditional criminal investigations including car thefts, bank robberies, and kidnappings also remained important.

In the 1960s and early 1970s, the Bureau took on investigations in the field of civil rights and organized crime. The threat of political violence occupied many of the Bureau's resources as did the threat of foreign espionage. In spite of Mr. Hoover's age and length of service, Presidents of both parties made the decision to keep him at the helm of the Bureau. Hoover, a career bureaucrat, had become more powerful than any man in the United States, including the President.

NEXT in series : 4 months at the FBI

Tiger's Tail

2009-12-05T00:02:55Z

Jean Baptiste Lacroix/Getty Images; AP Photo/David Zentz; LG/Flynet

How did Tiger Woods keep track of these three? It could be quite a chore keeping track of which cocktail waitress is denying what and who's sexting who. Tiger is reportedly revising a prenuptual agreement to give His wife, a staggering $55 million to keep her from walking a way with their two young children. Deepthroat said it first, "Follow the Money!"

BTW, do you think if the Florida Highway Patrol found you laid out barefoot on the front lawn, in shorts, with a cut lip, snoring at 2:30AM, after you just ran over a fire hydrant AND a tree in your SUV, that they might give you a breathalyser?

Wolf advise for the Tiger

Hey Tiger, this story ain't going away in my lifetime. Think of it as a PG rated OJ saga. KARMA baby! I don't care where you stick that Greg. But you're a jerk now and have always been a jerk. Your caddy is an asshole too. The free ride is over Mister T. Anna Nicole is dead and OJ is doing ten in the desert. You are THE tabloid tale now.

Maybe if you hadn't been the cheapest ass billionaire on the planet, you would have played this smarter. Las Vegas blackjack dealers say there has never been a bigger stiff than you. You think giving $55 million and counting to a wife who will never forgive you nor let you forget your ho's or the humiliation that she has gone through, is a wise use of your precious dollars?

Not for nothing Tiger, but put a fork in that marriage, it's done. You're not going to be able to keep that little five wood in your pants anyway. It's all over but the crying now. Be smart for a change. Pay Elin $20 million. Cut her loose and cut your loses at the same time. You will come out $35 million ahead, which is more than enough to finance a lifetime of Tigering around Vegas.

Besides, you won't be the first asshole on the block to get a D-I-V-O-R-C-E. Man up & move on. You're not too big too fail.

Obama is Too Arrogant to "Get It"

2009-12-02T06:51:54Z

For the first time in his presidency and similar to LBJ's handling of the Vietnam War, Obama found a way to alienate both the right and the left in his speech night at West Point. Three months of planing and that was the best he could do?

Good leaders are able to establish a strong middle ground that maintains support of their party's most intense partisans and diminishes the influence of the fiercest opponents. Reagan and Clinton both possessed this leadership, which Obama does not. Obama has struggled to achieve any major accomplishments during his first year in office. Does anyone have confidence that President Obama’s strategy will succeed in Afghanistan?

When Obama fails in Afghanistan, Democrats will still vote for his reelection. Even if Obama can convince the nation in 2012 that he succeeded in Afghanistan, Republicans will not support his reelection bid. Last night Obama had to convince Independents, who are abandoning him on Afghanistan, according to all the latest polls.

Obama talked out of both sides of his mouth, pandering to partisans on both sides. However, this is not the way you attract the Independents who will determine the election results in 2012. There are going to be more troops, but how are we going to win? Obama did not give us the answers. History tells us we will fail, just like every other country in has failed in Afghanistan since the beginning of recorded history.

Growth of the Executive Branch is Destroying US

2009-12-02T05:16:24Z

There is so much I want to write about, I don't know where to start. There is so much that I experienced working within the bureaucracy for 32 years. Both the Democrat and Republican Parties have completely abandoned the United States Constitution. This has become so successful, that those who support the Constitution are now called "wingnuts" & "teabaggers", portrayed as kooky radicals by the majority of the media.

I can't cover everything in a couple of weeks or even a couple of months. But I am going to do my best to get my message out over the next year, 2010. To quote FOX, I will report, you decide. I sincerely believe that if the citizens actually knew what was going on inside of the federal bureaucracy, there would be a bounty on the heads of government workers. Yes, I am sorry to say, it's that bad.

Government workers know it but they know it would be career suicide to reveal what's going on inside of your government. These people have families to feed and they are well aware that becoming a "whistle blower" is career suicide. The government destroys each and everyone who tries to do the right thing.

My experience inside the federal bureaucracy and my focus on the United States Constitution lead me to join the Libertarian Party. I joined when I was working for the government. I have never voted for a Bush or a Clinton. Unfortunately matters grow worse everyday and we are now at the point that our beloved Republic is in grace danger of failing and becoming a third world socialist state.

The truth of the matter is that Republicans nor Democrats control the government. Bureaucrats control our lives. Politicians come and go but the bureaucracies they create grow larger by the day. Bureaucracies never die, they morph into even larger more incompetent bureaucratic monsters.

You must understand, that politicians, depend on bureaucrats to gather the statistics and intelligence to support their positions. As they saying goes, figures don't lie but liars figure. High level Bureaucrats are always looking to pander to the party in power, so they can expand their own power and control.

To get my point across, I will tell my story. I will be truthful and objective. I began my federal career as a GS/2 clerk in 1976 when I was 21 years old. There were no GS/1's. GS/2 was as low as you could go. I retired as a GS/13 step 10 law enforcement, which is the same pay grade as a GS/15 step 6 civilian. GS/15 is the highest pay grade before moving into the Senior Executive Service (SES), which replaced the GS/16 pay grade.

The SES is actually a huge part of the problem with YOUR federal government . The SES created a level for career bureaucrats to compete with political appointees for power and prestige and to build even bigger empires within the bloated Executive Branch.

In fact, I believe the biggest threat to the national security of the United States is the growth of the Executive Branch of the federal government over the past 50-75 years, beginning with Franklin D. Roosevelt. The executive branch of the federal government began to get totally out of control after the JFK presidency, beginning with Lyndon Johnson.

Keep reading this blog over the next few months and I will shed some light on how our federal government went from the vision of our founding fathers to the mess we are in today. YOU, the people can save YOUR country but not before you take control of your destiny from the federal bureaucrats and return it to the people.

NEXT in series: 1976, the start of 32 years in the bureaucracy

Mr. Wolf has parted ways with Wikipedia

2009-11-29T20:59:33Z

Check out this Dude's blog. He helped build wikipedia. Now see what he has to say about those mofos
thewebserviceblog.co.uk/2008/10/31/wikipedia-sucks/

A few days ago, the Wall Street Journal reported that Wikipedia had lost "millions" of readers, volunteer writers and editors since the first quarter of 2007. As you saw in my last post, I decided to test the waters at Wikipedia. I found the editors to be hostile, biased and incompetent. I won't participate as the "wiki" is gone and the ass clowns are there to stay.

Ass Clown "Editors" Killing Wikepdia

2009-11-29T16:31:36Z

On November 27, 2009 the Wall Street Journal reported that, "Wikipedia.org is the fifth-most-popular Web site in the world, with roughly 325 million monthly visitors. But unprecedented numbers of the millions of online volunteers who write, edit and police it are quitting." The article by JULIA ANGWIN and GEOFFREY A. FOWLER said, "That could have significant implications for the brand of democratization that Wikipedia helped to unleash over the Internet -- the empowerment of the amateur. Volunteers have been departing the project that bills itself as "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" faster than new ones have been joining, and the net losses have accelerated over the past year."

"Wikipedia contributors have been debating widely what is behind the declines in volunteers. One factor is that many topics already have been written about. Another is the plethora of rules Wikipedia has adopted to bring order to its unruly universe -- particularly to reduce infighting among contributors about write-ups of controversial subjects and polarizing figures. As it matures, Wikipedia, one of the world's largest crowdsourcing initiatives, is becoming less freewheeling and more like the organizations it set out to replace. Today, its rules are spelled out across hundreds of Web pages. Increasingly, newcomers who try to edit are informed that they have unwittingly broken a rule -- and find their edits deleted, according to a study by researchers at Xerox Corp." -online.wsj.com/article/SB125893981183759969.html

"Wikipedia is becoming a more hostile environment," contends Mr. Ortega, a project manager at Libresoft, a research group at the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid. "Many people are getting burnt out when they have to debate about the contents of certain articles again and again."

On November 28, 2009 the news about Tiger Woods and his alleged relationship with Rachel Uchitel dominated the main stream, tabloid and sports media outlets. Tiger Woods is arguably the most famous active sports personality in the world. But Who is Rachel Uchitel?

I had never heard of Ms.Uchitel so I searched Wikipedia. I quickly found out that Wiki had "zero" information on Rachel Uchitel. Eventually I read a dozen or more articles on numerous websites and found out quit a bit about Ms.Uchitel. I decided to submit a biographical entry about Ms. Uchitel on Wikipedia after discovering that she was trending very high all day on Google.

Today you will find that "Rachel Uchitel pictures" are second in Google's "Todays Hot Trends" at 10:06 AM CST. She is both the 6th & 7th most searched as "TIger Woods Mistress" & "Tiger Woods Affair Rachel Uchitel"

If you go to Wikipedia this morning and search Rachel Uchitel Wikipedia you will get this from wiki, "There were no results matching the query. You may create the page "Rachel Uchitel".

So where is the well researched and annotated biography that I posted yesterday? It's gone forever, not edited but deleted by one of the so called "editors". You will also find that my comments questioning the deletion have also been deleted by another "editor".

I posted a link to my submission on Twitter and some of you may have read it before the arbitrary editors at Wikipedia deleted it. The submission was a fair and accurate "biography of a living person", which conformed with Wikipedia's guidelines.

Wikipedia is trending down and will soon be totally irrelevant. Wiki is not about "crowdsourcing" any more. Wikipedia is all about arrogant, arbitrary ass clown "volunteer editors" who get their kicks by butchering and deleting volunteer submissions.

Now you know why 8 years after Wikipedia began with a goal to provide everyone in the world free access to "the sum of all human knowledge," the declines in participation have raised questions about the encyclopedia's ability to continue.

UPDATE: Another ass clown at Wiki has nominated my latest submission as not being "wiki worthy" . If the link has not been deleted you can read all the BS here : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Uchitel

If the wiki volunteer fascists have already deleted my post, here is my defense as to why Rachel Uchitel is "significant" under Wikipedia's directives for a biography of a living person:
"This is exactly why @wsj reports that Wikipedia is losing millions of users. Click on link to see the BS involved to get a simple submission up on wiki. The speedy deletion of this page is contested. Reason: Uchitel is the subject of 3 of the top 10 Hot Topic searches trending on Google for the past 48 hours. Her accomplishments in VIP operations is significant. She is closely associated with some of the most famous personalities in the world. Uchitel is the subject of thousands of main stream news articles associating her with Tiger Woods, the most recognized sports personality in the world. A7 criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source. The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible. By any objective standard Rachel Uchitel is "Significant" and meets the criteria for a living person bio.

Wikipedia began with a goal to provide everyone in the world free access to "the sum of all human knowledge," the declines in participation have raised questions about the encyclopedia's ability to continue expanding its breadth

Hundereds of thousands of people have searched wiki for info on Rachel Uchitel in the past 48 hours. This number will increase into the millions as evidenced by Google trends. People from all over the world are seeking information on Uchitel at this very moment."

Here is the entry that Wikipedia ass clowns rejected. Why? Because they can!

Rachel Uchitel, born in 1975, is one of the most accomplished nightclub VIP operations manager in the United States. She is currently director of VIP operations for Pink Elephant in Southampton.[1] After college Ms.Uchitel worked in TV and film. She spent five years as a television producer at Bloomberg News. After her fiancee, Andy O'Grady, was killed in the World Trade Center attacks of 2001 she moved to Las Vegas.[2] Ms.Uchitel launched Tao nightclub and restaurant, which became the number-one grossing venue in the world.[citation needed] Two years later she moved back to New York to oversee VIP operations for Tao operated Clubs Stanton Social, Marquee, Tao Bistro, and Dune.[3]

Uchitel married Steven Ehrenkranz, a financial broker, in 2004. They were divorced in 2005 after only four months of marriage. Her grandfather, Maurice Uchitel, owned the famous Manhattan nightclub the El Morocco, from 1964-1970.[4][5]

^ ^ http://www.blackbookmag.com/article/rachel-uchitel-speaks-i-dont-appreciate-my-name-being-dragged-through-the-m/13442

^ ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/fashion/weddings/12VOWS.html

^ http://www.blackbookmag.com/article/prime-mover-rachel-uchitel-vip-diva/3300

^ ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/fashion/weddings/12VOWS.html

^ http://www.sundayvision.co.ug/detail.php?mainNewsCategoryId=7&newsCategoryId=453&newsId=455246

Introduction to Google Wave

2009-11-27T20:20:55Z

The user interface of Google Wave breaks new ground and yet is not unfamiliar as its layout resembles the inbox of your mail application. The time line that lets you recap how the wave has evolved and changed since your last visit is something that even wikis don’t have today—a feature that will surely be copied extensively in the future due to its intuitive usability. The user interface motivates further contributions to the wave. This is an excellent way to convince a lot of people to participate.

It is a completely new experience to actually see your friends, colleagues and contacts type in and change content in real time. No other application apart from a few client-side chat tools currently offers such a service via a web interface. If you’re a tech geek, you’ll love that part of Google Wave. It is a powerful innovation when it comes to real-time communication and collaboration. It is competing with the well-known comforts of email, wikis and chat, but in a lot of use cases, I think Wave will win.

Brainstorming, early concept creation and discussion is what I see Google Wave being used for extensively in the near future. It can also serve as a multi-user note-taking platform for meetings and sessions in your company or university. If you want to organize an event collaboratively, Google Wave will most likely replace wikis. That’s a punch in the gut for all creators of wiki software. These are just the most obvious uses. As more people use Google Wave and become comfortable with it, they will begin using it in entirely new ways. The real-time communications it makes possible will override its weak points because of the greater efficiency it allows for any group trying to work together.

The biggest downside is there are no means of monitoring waves. This is Google Wave’s biggest weakness. I don’t get an email, G-voice alert, or any other notification in the communication systems I already use today when there is new activity in a wave.

If you need a Wave invite so you can try it out, call, email or leave comment and I will hook you up.

Couple slips though Secret Service to crash WH State Dinner

2009-11-26T07:26:15Z

Another ObamaNation WTF moment

White House Party Crasher with Moron in Chief

Crashing a state dinner at the White House apparently takes a security breakdown as well as some kind of nerve.The Secret Service is looking into its own security procedures after determining that a Virginia couple, Michaele and Tareq Salahi, managed to slip into Tuesday night's state dinner at the White House even though they were not on the guest list, agency spokesman Ed Donovan said.

Donovan confirmed the identities of the couple. The Washington Post, which first reported on their evening out, said the Salahis were well-known in the Virginia horse-country set and were being considered for the Bravo reality TV show "Real Housewives of D.C."

In an interview with the "CBS Early Show" in September, Michaele Salahi said, "President Obama has made it very accessible for anyone to visit the White House, so that's like a big thing right now."

Stay tuned for updates, this is going to get real good. My guess is that the cancer known as "political correctness", which always trumps security considerations in the Obamanation, will be front and center of this debacle.

Perfect Xmas Gift for the Girl who has Everything?

2009-11-24T21:40:31Z

BLOOMINGTON, Ill. — Sparkly reindeer-dung necklaces are going on sale at an Illinois zoo that hopes to attract the same holiday shoppers who swept up its dung Christmas ornaments last year. The limited-edition Magical Reindeer Gem necklaces will debut Friday at the Miller Park Zoo in Bloomington.

The $15 pendant necklaces contain dried, sterilized reindeer droppings — sprayed with glitter — on a beaded chain. They'll be available at the zoo's gift shop, or by mail for $20. The ornaments are back, and 450 have already sold this season. About 1,500 are still available for $7.50, or $10 by mail. Miller Park Zoological Society spokeswoman Susie Ohley admits it's a bit silly but estimates the zoo could make $16,500. The zoo lost $200,000 under city budget cuts this year.

Thanksgiving Turkeys?

2009-11-24T21:29:39Z

Before Sunday's win over the hapless Redskins, the last time the Cowboys won a game scoring seven points or fewer was in December 1970.

Randy Galloway of the Fort Worth Star Telegram and ESPN 103.3 has some thoughts to share on the 2009 Cowboys

Some 46 million turkeys, so say the pilgrims who track such things, will have died this week by the time we get to Thursday. And then there’s the Dallas Cowboys."Stayin’ alive," said receiver Patrick Crayton, who was describing his game-winning end zone-improvised route, as opposed to pop songs of the ’70s, or even the shaky condition of his team.

Beating the Washington Redskins by a final score of 7-6 sounded more like a Frankie Francisco bullpen collapse two blocks to the east, but it actually defined the Cowboys in Sunday’s desperate and, finally, successful survival act.
Lose this one, and even with Oakland on the Thanksgiving platter for Thursday, this was a team that was cooked, along with those 46 million turkeys, even before the dreaded December death march. The math is not complicated. Two touchdowns in the last two games. Fourteen points, period. And totally outplayed by an outmanned Redskins defense on Sunday.

The big local debate after Green Bay a week ago was "giving up on the run." For nearly 58 minutes on Sunday, the Cowboys had plenty of yards on the ground. Except there were no points on the scoreboard. In the NFL, if you’re not passing to win, you’re not winning. OK, it was Washington, a club with so many issues that anything is possible. So a win became possible.
Romo suffered a back injury early, and he was also awful until late. But when it was absolutely up-against-the-wall Redskin mothers, then Tony delivered, as did his receivers, on a gut-grabbing clutch drive in deep stretch.

Afterward, the locker-room theme was mostly the typical "a win is a win in this league," and if the players and coaches had noticed it, they would have pointed to what happened to the Steelers in Kansas City on Sunday, or, yes, how those incoming Raiders shocked the Bengals.

From wideout Miles Austin: "I don’t consider it an offensive slump for us. We won, didn’t we? But let’s see what happens next week." Actually, "next week" comes Thursday. And the Raiders are not a bad defensive club. One thing the Raiders will obviously concentrate on is that Romo didn’t complete a pass to a wide receiver until he hit Austin for 23 yards on the last play of the third quarter.

Not that Roy Williams didn’t have an opportunity or two, but, frankly, shouldn’t Sam Hurd be warming up, or even Kevin Ogletree, to take over Roy’s spot? This Roy thing is looking hopeless. (OK, OK, OK. Jerry would not approve.)

Never had Tony thrown for so few yards (158) and won a game.

Don’t expect it to happen again.

Randy Galloway can be heard 3-6 p.m. weekdays on Galloway & Co. on ESPN/103.3 FM.

Read all of Randy's Column in the Star Telegram www.star-telegram.com/sports/columnists/randy_galloway/story/1782327-p2.html

Bonzer Wolf™ Trademark

2009-11-23T18:35:01Z

Bonzer Wolf™ has established the existence of a common-law trademark right based on his public persona. BONZERWOLF™, bonzerwolf™, BonzerWolf™ & BONZERWOLF™ trademarks were established at the same tiime.

Readers can still take my name in vain, call me out and say whatever they want about Bonzer Wolf™ intellectual property. In spite of the ObamaNation, the Constitution is the law of the land in the United States of America and still applies to Bonzer Wolf™.

You can use a trademark for editorial or informational purposes without infringing. Such uses do not require permission because they inform, educate, or express opinions protected under the First Amendment. The laws protecting personalities' names only go so far. But you will likely run into problems if you sell goods or services using the trademark personality's name, or if you imply the endorsement of the celebrity for any goods or services.

When a person's name functions as a trademark, it's in relation to a product or service -- in this case the Bonzer Wolf™ live journal or "blog". You can only use the Bonzer Wolf™ trademark to stop others from competing against you unfairly, not to prevent the listing of your name on court documents, in newspapers or in any type of editorial use.

While celebrity or public personality names are generally not eligible for trademark registration, these individuals do typically have a right of publicity. The right of publicity provides such persons with the ability to control and profit from commercial use of their name. Though similar to a trademark, the right of publicity is not considered sufficient to satisfy the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) trademark element.

However, UDRP panels have created a way for public personalities to navigate around this problem. In these domain cases, panels note that the UDRP accepts claims based on common-law trademark rights. As such, public personalities may establish the existence of a common-law trademark right based on their recognized accomplishments or public persona. Therefore, people who are well known and able to show a current and direct correlation of their name with a brand or service, do not have a problem trade marking their names.

Even if a person can prove a common-law trademark right in the name, the right does not necessarily prevail at all costs. The second and third UDRP factors require celebrities to show that the domain owner lacked a legitimate use for the domain name and that the registration is in bad faith. A Panel may determine that the domain owner has a legitimate interest in the domain if they share the same personal name as the trademark name or uses the domain for a fan/gripe website.

However, regardless of a domain owner’s legitimate interest, a determination that the domain name was registered in bad faith will sway any decision in favor of the trade mark holder. Source confusion and intent to profit are the bad faith factors most commonly cited in domain name proceedings. With source confusion, panels worry that use of the trademark personal name will confuse internet users into thinking that a website is run, owned, endorsed or sponsored by the celebrity. This concern is more prominent when the name consists solely of a personal name and is not coupled with other terms such as “fans.”

In addition to confusion, any commercial use of a personality domain name will also be weighed against the domain owner. Commercial considerations include offering the domain name for sale or loading the website with sponsored advertisements. In fact, panels have generally held that even if the website is being used as a fan/gripe site, any evidence of commercial gain, i.e. sponsored links, will lead to a finding of bad faith.

©2009 Bonzer Wolf™

"Moderate" Democrat is a Misnomer

2009-11-23T16:01:28Z

Do you believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny or the Tooth Fairy? Democrats believe in all of them. Democrats also believe in Utopia. But for the rest of us, none of them exist anywhere, except in the imaginations of children, fools and Marxists.

The outcome of Saturday's vote to proceed with debate on the Marxist Health Care Act was predictable. The only question was how much "pork" the "moderate" Democrats could get to buy their votes.

Moderate Democrats are role players in a drama. Per the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) , "The designated role for the 'moderates' is to protest and posture enough to claim to have 'improved' the bill before they inevitably acquiesce in it becoming law".

In other words, "moderates" resistance is BS. You see, there is no such thing as a "moderate" Democrat, except in the imagination of the liberal media.

Mary Landrieu who claims to have "grave concerns" about the cost of the bill, was granted a political gratuity (pork) of $300 million dollars. In her floor speech, she actually told reporters that she could not be bought for a mere $100 million. "I will correct something. It's not $100 million, it's $300 million, and I'm proud of it and will keep fighting for it."

WSJ editorial response to "moderate" Democrat Senator Landrieu of Louisiana says it best, "Note that Senator Landrieu's price included no substantive change in the $25 billion in Medicaid burdens that this legislation will impose on other states, or any reduction in its huge new tax burden on Louisiana small businesses, or any change in the rationing commission it will establish for Medicare. Mrs. Landrieu was voting to enable all of those provisions to take one more giant step toward enactment."

Voters can expect more BS from these so called "moderates" as the debate takes place on the Senate Floor. Don't be tricked by this "play-acting". This bill is fatally flawed and the only way to improve it, is to defeat it. I don't believe in Santa Claus or Moderate Democrats. The only hope for defeating this bill lies with Independent Joseph Lieberman. And by the way, the odds of Senator Lieberman doing the right thing are not very high.

Romo needs to get it together PRONTO

2009-11-22T22:10:50Z

Tony Romo and the Dallas Cowboys were awful on offense for a second straight week. This time, they were lucky to be playing the broken-down Washington Redskins.Romo led only a single scoring drive, hitting Patrick Crayton for a 10-yard touchdown pass with 2:41 left, and it was enough to give Dallas a 7-6 victory over Washington on Sunday to preserve first place in the NFC East.

The Cowboys (7-3) avoided getting shut out the previous week by scoring with 38 seconds left at Green Bay, then almost saw it happen again at home. This would've been especially stunning since the Redskins (3-7) were down to third-stringers at running back and right guard and came in without their expensive defensive tackle and a star tight end. They'd also never shut out Dallas in the previous 98 meetings.

Horned Frogs to Host NIT Consolation Round

2009-11-21T20:50:10Z

Frogs will host Texas State, Colgate and University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee on Monday & Tuesday

My daughter graduated from Texas State University in San Marcos (near Austin). I will be sitting in my aisle season ticket seat, 3 rows behind the TCU bench in Fort Worth for all four games.

Frogs vs Bobcats will be the final game on Tuesday night. Will be wearing gear for BOTH teams. My money & my daughter went to Division I Texas State University but neither she nor I ever attended a sporting event in San Marcos. TCU will be the favorite to win (betting line) for sure. Looks like I will be politically correct for once in my life and support both teams. As a graduate of NCAA Division II Armstrong Atlantic State University, I don't ever have a conflict with TCU.

The TCU men's basketball program will play host to the 25th Annual Dick's Sporting Goods NIT Season Tip-Off consolation round at Daniel-Meyer Coliseum this upcoming Monday and Tuesday. The Horned Frogs - who entered the Preseason NIT as the seventh seed - was one of three sites chosen to host the consolation rounds. The Frogs posted an 83-65 victory over Cal State Northridge in the first round followed by a 53-49 setback to host-program Arizona State in the finals of the West Bracket.

This is the first time that TCU has ever hosted a Preseason NIT game as the Frogs welcome Texas State, Colgate and University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Texas State and UW Milwaukee will open up play on Monday with game time slated for 5:30 p.m. while TCU and Colgate will play in the nightcap beginning at 8:00 p.m. The Frogs and Raiders met last season where TCU recorded a 62-37 victory at Daniel-Meyer Coliseum.

On Tuesday, Colgate and UW Milwaukee will play the first game beginning at 5:30 p.m. while the Frogs and Bobcats close out the Preseason NIT with an 8:00 p.m. tip-off. This will be the first meeting between the Frogs and Bobcats since the 2005-06 campaign as TCU holds a 2-0 advantage in the series records.

TCU men's basketball season ticket holders will be guaranteed their same seats for both day of Preseason NIT action for $10 per day. Non-season ticket holders can purchase tickets for $15 for adults and $8 for youth (ages 3-17). All TCU students will be admitted free with a valid student ID.

For more information on tickets, please contact the TCU Athletics Ticket Office at (817) 257-FROG or visit gofrogs.cstv.com/

Wolf Family Alma Maters

Democrats to force floor debate on Health Bill

2009-11-21T04:53:18Z

(from wire reports)

An influential centrist Senate Democrat said Friday he would vote to move forward with health-overhaul legislation, raising expectations that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will secure the 60 votes needed to thwart Republican efforts to stall the bill.

Ending weeks of uncertainty, Sen. Ben Nelson (D., Neb.) said supporting the Republican filibuster -- which threatens to block Democrats from opening debate -- would deny voters in his state a voice on the issue. "I won't slam the door of the Senate in the face of Nebraskans," he said. "The Senate owes them a full and open debate."

The senator also secured one of several favors that Democratic leaders doled out to win over waverers: He persuaded them to keep out a provision that would repeal the insurance industry's antitrust exemption, congressional aides said.

Not long after Mr. Nelson's announcement, another Democrat whose backing had been in question, Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, said he, too, would support moving forward. Mr. Wyden Friday secured a commitment from Mr. Reid to support a $4 billion amendment designed to give workers greater flexibility to purchase health insurance outside the workplace. Mr. Wyden said the proposal represented a "modest step" forward and was "my price" for supporting moving ahead.

While momentum was building behind Mr. Reid, the support of at least two other Democrats -- Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas -- remained in doubt late Friday.
A Landrieu spokeswoman said the senator was undecided. Even before Mr. Reid unveiled the 2,074-page measure this week, he made a strong play for the support of Ms. Landrieu, a centrist Democrat, adding a provision that would steer an estimated $200 million to $250 million in Medicaid funds to her state in fiscal 2011, congressional aides said.

A spokeswoman for Sen. Lincoln, who faces a tough re-election battle next year, said she was still reviewing the bill. Polls show the White House-backed bill is unpopular in Arkansas. Democrats say states such as Arkansas, where many people lack health insurance, will benefit from the bill because it includes government subsidies to help lower- and middle-income families buy coverage. Republicans say the government can't afford such steps.

I predict the vote will be exactly 60-40 tomorrow night. The two remaining senators are simply holding out for more ransom money.